"Dawkins is forced to contend with the highly awkward fact that his view that the natural sciences are an intellectual superhighway to atheism is rejected by most scientists, irrespective of their religious views… the point is simple: nature is open to many legitimate interpretations. It can be interpreted in atheist, deist, theist, and many other ways - but it does not demand to be interpreted in any of these.
…
One of the greatest disservices that Dawkins has done to the natural sciences is to portray them as relentlessly and inexorably atheistic. They are nothing of the sort; yet Dawkins’s crusading vigor has led to the growth of this alienating perception in many parts of North American conservative Protestantism. Is there any better way to ensure that the sciences are seen in a negative light within this community, as interest in and commitment to religion resurges throughout much of the world?"

gentlemen, i am now going to tell you, whether you care to hear it or not, why I could not even become an insect

follow me on lofter im gona be using it a lot more often than this micro nerd blog site →

one time I saw asha when I was driving around and I screamed her name and she posted a thing on Facebook 2 minutes later like “SOMEONE JUST YELLED MY NAME” and I cackled like Newman

whoever designed the iPhone’s autocorrect was on their game. i can just think words and slam on the keyboard and i feel like its reading my mind